Characterization of an aging Puerto Rican cohort with cancer: Analyzing sociodemographic factors and concomitant comorbidities. [R]

Background: Incidence of cancer is constantly increasing in the United States, and Puerto Rico is no exception. The island is currently experiencing low birth rates, signifying that its population is primarily composed of aging citizens that experience a growing need for access to healthcare and medical literature, especially in those with cancer. In this study, we aimed to characterize an aging Puerto Rican cohort with a diagnosis of cancer. Method(s): A questionnaire with sociodemographic and medical inquiries was administered to participants receiving an mRNA vaccine at a COVID-19 vaccination clinic between December 2020 and June 2021. Participants of age 60+ with a diagnosis of cancer, along with their comorbidities, were identified. Multivariate analyses were executed. This study is IRB approved. Result(s): A total of 100 aging participants with a diagnosis of cancer were included: 55 were female and 45 were male, with a mean age of 72.70+/-8.07 (age range: 61-95). When assessing race, participants identified as follows: 68% White, 23% Black or African American, 8% other race, and 1% American Indian or Alaska Native. Concerning ethnicity, 97% identified as Hispanic or Latino, while 3% did not regard themselves as such. When evaluating the cancer diagnoses provided, 27% of female participants had breast cancer and 7% had some form of gynecologic malignancy. Whereas, in males, 42% indicated a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Regarding concomitant comorbidities, 45% of participants had hypertension, 30% had diabetes mellitus, 18% had hypothyroidism, 15% had asthma, and 3% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing sex and prevalence of concomitant diabetes mellitus or hypertension (p=0.2125). There was also no statistically significant difference when assessing racial identity and presence of concomitant diabetes mellitus or hypertension (p=0.7373). Out of 91 participants who answered the health insurance inquiry, 82% possessed private insurance, 13% had public insurance, and 4% did not have insurance. There was no statistically significant difference when assessing private, public, or no health insurance status and the presence of concomitant diabetes mellitus or hypertension (p=0.9086). Conclusion(s): Data evidenced a diverse aging Puerto Rican cohort with cancer, showing a predominance in prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women. Analysis suggested that the presence of concomitant diabetes mellitus or hypertension in an aging population with cancer was not linked to sex or racial identity. Additionally, the type or lack of health insurance did not influence the prevalence of concomitant diabetes mellitus or hypertension. Characterizing the aging Hispanic population in Puerto Rico and the United States is important, as these studies could be beneficial in the future approach, understanding and treatment of this population with historically limited medical data available.

The Racial Divide: A Follow Up Study on Racial Disparity Amongst COVID-19 Survivors in an Urban Community in New Jersey

Background. We conducted a follow up study on patients previously diagnosed with COVID-19 one year ago in an urban community in Paterson, New Jersey. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 as well as assess for receptiveness towards COVID-19 vaccination amongst various ethnic groups. Methods. This was a prospective cohort study consisting of patients who had COVID-19 in the months of March and April of 2020. This was a single institutional study conducted at St. Joseph's Hospital in Paterson, NJ from March to April of 2021. Patients included were either male or female aged 18 years or older. Patients were contacted by telephone to participate to completed the survey. Chi-square testing and multivariable logistic regression analysis were utilized for statistical analysis. Results. Of the 170 patients enrolled in the study, the most common ethnicity was Hispanic (79/170 [46.47%]), followed by African American (46/170 [27.05%]). 83 patients were male (83/170 [48.82%]). Caucasians were the most willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine (28/30 [93.3%]), followed by Asians (13/14 [92.8%]), Hispanics (63/78 [80.7%]) and African Americans (29/46 [63.0%]). Hispanics had the highest rate of job loss (31/79 [39.24%]), followed by African Americans (16/46 [34.7%]). Hispanics were found to be in the most financial distress (31/79 [39.2%]), followed by African Americans (17/46 [36.9%]). Hispanics and African Americans were more likely to refuse COVID-19 vaccination (p: 0.02). Hispanics were more likely to lose their jobs compared to Caucasians (odds ratio,4.456;95% CI, 1.387 to 14.312;p: 0.0121). African Americans were also more likely to lose their jobs when compared to Caucasians (odds ratio, 4.465;95% CI, 1.266 to 15.747;p: 0.0200). Conclusion. Hispanics reported the most financial distress and with nearly 40% losing their jobs, the highest in our study group. 37% of African Americans experienced job loss and financial distress following their diagnosis with COVID-19. Only 63% of African Americans and 80.7% of Hispanics were willing to get vaccinated, mostly due to lack of trust in the vaccine. Statistical analysis showed Hispanics and African Americans were more likely to lose their jobs and refuse COVID-19 vaccination following diagnosis with COVID-19.

The impact of the threat of COVID-19 on visiting intentions as influenced by different destination logos

Purpose This research aims to examine the role of perceived threat (i.e. COVID-19) on people's preferences for destination logo designs. In addition, it investigates the influence of childhood socioeconomic status (SES) and sensation seeking on the aforementioned effect. Design/methodology/approach Five experiments are used. Studies 1 A and 1B examine the impact of the threat of COVID-19 on visiting intentions as influenced by different destination logos. Study 2 replicates the previous studies and tests for evidence of mediation by the perceived risk. Studies 3 and 4 investigate the moderating role of childhood SES and sensation seeking. Findings The results show that a salient threat of COVID-19 leads people to display higher visiting intentions when presented with simpler (vs complex) destination logo designs. The perceived risk mediates this effect as well. This preference is evident only for people with low (vs high) childhood SES and only for relatively low sensation seekers. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the branding literature by investigating how situational factors can influence affective reactions to brand logos and to the tourism literature by further investigating the impact of logos on visiting intentions. Practical implications This study provides actionable insights for tourism marketers and logo designers, allowing them to select or create positively perceived destination logos during a potential global crisis. Originality/value This research offers the first evidence that pandemic-related threat perceptions influence people's visiting intentions when presented with different destination logos, and that these effects are influenced by individual characteristics such as childhood SES or sensation seeking. In doing so, the current study offers a more sophisticated understanding of the potential boundary conditions driving people's brand logo evaluation.

The impact of Covid-19 on the management of Mexican companies

This article proposes to identify the main effects that Covid-19 has caused in the municipality of Guaymas Sonora through an exploratory study. This research will allow a broader perspective about COVID-19 in companies in Sonora, Mexico. At the same time, it will allow to know: the interferences that the companies went through during the phase of suspension of work, how the situation was before the strike, if they were benefited with government support and will show the main effects on the Sonoran economy.

THE LONG HAUL: A FOLLOW UP STUDY OF PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH COVID-19 ONE YEAR AGO AT AN URBAN MEDICAL CENTER IN NEW JERSEY

TOPIC: Chest Infections TYPE: Original Investigations PURPOSE: Many patients diagnosed with COVID-19 develop a post-viral syndrome commonly known as Long COVID-19. Long COVID is described as when a patient experiences persistent symptoms for more than 12 weeks after their initial infection. Recent studies have shown that patients may experience long covid for as many as 6 months after initial infection. We conducted a follow up study on patients diagnosed with COVID-19 one year ago at one of the worst affected tertiary hospitals in the state of New Jersey. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study consisting of patients with a confirmed positive COVID-19 test by PCR in the months of March and April of 2020 in the St. Joseph’s University Hospital network. Individuals who were either admitted to the hospital or tested positive in the outpatient setting with Sars- CoV2 were included in the study. Patients under 18 years of age or those with cognitive impairment or inability to complete the survey were excluded. Informed consent was taken over the telephone. The participants completed a comprehensive questionnaire including sociodemographic information and a review of systems to evaluate for persistent symptoms they have experienced over the past year directly due to COVID-19. All patient identifying information was de-identified in compliance with HIPAA rules and regulations. RESULTS: There were 91 inpatients ( 91/173 [52.6%]) and 82 outpatients (82/173 [47.4%]) with a mean age of 51.5. The most common ethnicities were Hispanic (80/173 [46.24%]) African American (48/173 [27.74%]), Caucasian (32/173 [18.49%]) and the most common comorbidities were hypertension (68/173 [39.5%]), obesity (45/173 [26.9%]) and diabetes (33/173 [19.1%]). There were 91 inpatients ( 91/173 [52.6%]) and 82 outpatients (82/173 [47.4%]), of which 85 were male (85/173 [49.42%]). Overall 83 patients (47.9%) still experienced at least one persistent symptom after initial infection. The most commonly reported symptoms were shortness of breath (44/173 [25.4%]), fatigue (43/173 [21%]), anxiety (36/173 [20.8%]), difficulty focusing/brain fog (32/173 [18.5%]), body aches (32/173 [18.5%]), headaches (29/173 [16.8%]), memory loss (25/173 [14.5%]), cough (23/173 [13.3%]), depression (22/173 [12.7%]), chest pain (19/173 [11%]), palpitations (15/173 [8.7%]), lightheadedness (15/173 [8.7%]), runny nose (12/173 [6.9%]) and loss of taste (11/173 [6.4%]). CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population nearly half of all patients (47.9%) still experienced at least one symptom 12 months after their initial infection. In both patient populations the most common persistent symptoms were shortness of breath, fatigue, anxiety and difficulty focusing/brain fog. The risk factors and pathophysiology of long covid remain unknown, highlighting the importance of further research into the topics. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nearly half of our patient population still experienced at least one symptom from their COVID-19 infection after one year. This further suggests that infection with COVID-19 may carry a risk of developing long term and possibly permanent sequelae from the virus. As more patients continue to be infected with COVID-19 and subsequently develop long covid, a public health crisis may be looming in the future. This highlights the need for continued public education on COVID-19 as well as the critical importance of widespread vaccination across the world to end the pandemic. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Polina Aron, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Hamdallah Ashkar, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Sohail Chaudhry, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Arslan Chaudhry, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Beenish Faheem, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Alisa Farokhian, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by George Horani, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Humberto Jimenez, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Christina Kmiecik, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Patrick Michael, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Christopher Millet, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Spandana Narvaneni, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Sherif Roman, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Fady Shafeek, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Yezin Shamoon, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Jin Suh, source=Web Response

The moderating role of childhood socioeconomic status on the impact of nudging on the perceived threat of coronavirus and stockpiling intention

Communications that include nudges and framing strategies are ubiquitous in our daily lives. In this paper, we investigate how different nudging strategies during a public health campaign, particularly supplementary information and statistics, influence perceptions of threat and stockpiling intentions, while also considering the role of childhood socioeconomic status. Specifically, building upon prior work in behavioral economics, we hypothesize that the presence of additional statistics elicits lower perceived threat and intention to stockpile. In addition, we predict find that the childhood socioeconomic status of individuals influences these effects. Three studies offer evidence for those predictions and demonstrate the importance of message framing in uncertain circumstances. Overall, this work contributes to the literature on nudging and life history theory by investigating how communication strategies can be used to increase or decrease perceived threat in order to achieve desired outcomes (e.g., limiting stockpiling or respecting social distancing).